Post
by lmontejo » Sun Oct 23, 2005 10:48 am
Charlie, this is the same device, but with an altimeter. Are you getting air that is that high???
On a more serious note, with such devices, I believe we can start another breed of kiting in the bay - x-country kiting. No different again than what we do on sailplanes. We could use similar techniques. The advent of that has been the Crissy-Berkeley downwinder. Of course, this could get far more complex, i.e. Alameda-3rd Avenue-Alameda, all in one afternoon. That is some 34 miles, and I suspect such a trip on a well chosen day, would take a couple of hours. In sailing, as in sailplanes, distance is interesting, but what really separates the men from the boys is speed.
In other words, once we learn how to do these crossings safely, our next goal will be how fast we achieve them.
Of course, we could start simple. Buoys or waypoints near Alameda, we set up a course, and we see who can do it the fastest. This is already being done at St. Francis.
This would also have the added benefit of moving the sport away from its current gymanistics, short stature, 14 year-old direction, to a very different slant and one more in tune with sailing and gliding. And by the way, you could still get some jump or two during these competitions - ideally turning around buoys. Anywhere else and you would lose time!
Finally, this all takes us again to what kind of kites are we looking for, their performance, etc. A sailplane for aerobatics is very different than a sailplane for x-country, and sailboats also vary dramatically depending on what we want them for. Right now, we seem to have a vanilla flavor in kiting. One kite (or quiver) fits all. I still don't know where the crossbow fits in all this, but any kite with a wider range will always be better suited for x-country than our current "C" kites.
That's all for now.
Leo