spraying for the light brown apple mot

All Off-Topic items not related to kiting can be posted here. Please post all For Sale items in the Classifieds Ads section.

Moderators: BayAreaKite, WindMuch

Forum rules
Please post all For Sale items in the Classified Ads section. Thank you.

spraying for the light brown apple mot

Postby dz » Mon Apr 07, 2008 9:17 pm

as some people are worried about the consequences, I see the Berkeley Ecology Center is having a meeting on this with a few experts to explain the situation and what may happen:

http://www.ecologycenter.org/calendar/e ... ntID=25374

Berkeley Ecology Center event

also I just read this in the East Bay Express:
http://www.eastbayexpress.com/blogs/spr ... oid=659468Spraying For Money or Moths?
User avatar
dz
Valued Contributor
Valued Contributor
 
Posts: 153
Joined: Wed Aug 01, 2007 8:22 am
Location: san francisco

Postby dz » Mon Apr 14, 2008 11:09 am

The San Francisco Board of Supervisors held a public hearing on April 7th in a meeting of Audits and Oversights Committee,


A videotape of this hearing can be viewed at SFGTV,
http://sanfrancisco.granicus.com/ViewPu ... view_id=11SFBOS hearing April 7 2008

The first speaker is Robert Dowell of CA Dept of Food and Agriculture, this presentation runs up to about the first hour.
Sup Sandoval questions him at about 01:00:00.

Testimony at this hearing worth watching :
(just scroll forward in the timeline)

01:24:15
Dr James Kerry, prof of entomology UC Davis
states that LBAM is not a recent invader,
and that eradication is not possible.
Also asserts that Trade Policy needs to be reviewed re this issue.

01:39:30
Carolyn Cox, director of the Center for Environmental Health, Oakland
who states, bio-pesticides are not subject to testing as other pesticides.

01:48:20
Mike Lindburg(Sp?) citizen, writer communications consultant,
and the person who volunteered to compile a report on complaints of the spraying in Monterey & santa cruz (when no govt agency did).

02:08:50
Dr Daniel Harter, Director of Arboretum UC Santa Cruz,
Presents his research on the control of LBAM in New Zealand.
Many arguments against aerial spraying, particularly collateral damage.

A lot of the general public testimony is also worthy of attention.


(Yikes! looks like human experimentation without informed consent!)













, [I][U]
User avatar
dz
Valued Contributor
Valued Contributor
 
Posts: 153
Joined: Wed Aug 01, 2007 8:22 am
Location: san francisco

Postby dz » Sat May 31, 2008 8:25 am

Interview with Michael Lynberg : complied a report of Complaints of Adverse Reactions
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n7Q6pmLX3po


Michael Lynberg

Roy Upton reports damage to marine life
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c5NMhVwWe3IROY UPTON of Citizens for Health


Monterey Bay experienced an extreme red tide shortly after the controversial aerial spraying of Monterey and Santa Cruz Counties

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PvDHzQKaqqI
Light Brown Apple Moth Spray Causes Severe Red Tide
User avatar
dz
Valued Contributor
Valued Contributor
 
Posts: 153
Joined: Wed Aug 01, 2007 8:22 am
Location: san francisco

Postby Bulldog » Sat May 31, 2008 11:19 am

There is no connection between the red tide and the spraying, it's already been disproven.

Also, none of the adverse reactions can be scientifically linked to the spray. People reported reactions in areas that were sprayed with plain water as a control.

There is alot of misinformation being put out there by irresponsible groups. Pheromones are not pesticides; they don't kill anything and are used in infinitesmal concentrations. If CDFA fails to take action against the moth, they will forced to use much more toxic materials.
Paul
aka Pablito
It says 10M, but it's really a 9.
User avatar
Bulldog
Old School
Old School
 
Posts: 1781
Joined: Thu Jun 22, 2006 7:23 pm

Postby dz » Tue Jun 03, 2008 2:47 am

There does seem to be a lot of disagreement about the facts. I imagine that there is probably some inaccuracy on both sides, it would be good to have more clarity.

We have some arguments from concerned citizens of various professions who are putting long unpaid hours into fighting this.

And then there is the CDFA's agenda.

I don't understand why CDFA hasn't researched a variety of other options for dealing w the moth, such as using natural predators. Flying planes over cities and smothering everything with Checkmate, just does not seem like a good idea to me.

Also people seem to be worried about the other so called "inert" ingredients in the spray, not so much the pheromones.
Anne Haiden's paper :
http://www.stopthespray.org/Health_Haza ... sition.pdf






Health Hazards...
User avatar
dz
Valued Contributor
Valued Contributor
 
Posts: 153
Joined: Wed Aug 01, 2007 8:22 am
Location: san francisco


Return to Off-Topic Forum

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest