Post
by shred_da_gorge » Fri Sep 13, 2013 5:17 pm
Ah Wade, you've resurrected a northwest classic! That's my buddy Jim on a July 4th weekend at the Event Site, basically screwing with tourists. Yes, that's a 2-line Wipika he's on, and yes he can fly it like nobody's business. There was a whole drawn-out act that preceded this, starting by parking at the far end among the windsurfers and dragging the board across the pavement and down the sidewalk, then asking several people (non-locals) if they knew how to do this sport. It was the funniest April Fool's joke in July I've ever seen.
Anyway back OT, being a cyclist for decades I've seen this debate a time or two (hundred) before. It's not currently against the law to not wear a helmet while kiting, skiing, snowboarding, skateboarding, cycling, etc. Regardless of whether you think it's a good idea or not, you also have the right to not launch someone if they don't have a helmet, if they have a GoJoe, if they are wearing a pink wetsuit... whatever. Most of my friends have been kiting since its inception and windsurfing before that, and they, like me, wear a helmet on select occasions and choose not to for convenience on many others. If you say you won't launch me I'd say "that's cool" and find someone else.
Great point Yoda made about helmet fit, which is a particular beef of mine about the helmet debate as it relates to cycling. I'd venture to guess more than 50% of people on bikes wearing helmets would render theirs almost completely ineffective in a crash, but then again the number of situations where a cyclist actually puts their helmet to the test is vastly overstated. It's all about perception. The seatbelt analogy is another favorite of mine - often made by people too young to remember when the insurance industry bullied the federal government into forcing states to make it mandatory or lose significant highway funding. When I was growing up the law was repealed by voters three times in a row before it was made mandatory and people begrudgingly started to wear them. It was perceived to be another example of 'nanny state' government interfering with individual freedoms at the time!
Sure I hope I never have my head put to the test on a day I choose to kite without a helmet (and it's for convenience not cool factor - I disagree kiting is a 'cool factor' sport and I hope it never comes to that). I also hope I don't die of cancer brought on by the higher concentrations of mercury present in the SF bay leeching down from abandoned quicksilver mines. I guess we pick our poisons, but most of all I hope my choice to go helmet-less never causes harm to someone else.